Wednesday, February 27, 2019

The best city to live in every state

Corrections & Clarifications: A previous version of this story misstated the geographical location of Waynesboro, Virginia.

There are nearly 20,000 villages, towns and cities across the 50 states, and not all of them are equally conducive to the well-being of those who live there.

While quality of life is subject to a range of factors – close relationships and personal health being among the most important – the local community and environment can also have a meaningful impact.

When it comes to choosing a place to call home, everyone has their own priorities and subjective tastes. Still, there are specific attributes some communities share that are almost universally desirable: safe streets, a strong economy, affordability and a range of entertainment options, to name a few.

24/7 Wall St. created a weighted index of over two dozen measures to identify the best city to live in each state. We considered all boroughs, census designated places, cities, towns and villages with at least 8,000 residents.

Start the day smarter: Get USA TODAY's Daily Briefing in your inbox

More: 25 industries experiencing the fastest growth in the US economy

More: 25 cities that lost the most jobs in 2018

More: These are the most expensive zip codes in the US this year

These cities tend to have much in common beyond the index components upon which they were ranked. For one, these communities are often within commuting distance of a major metropolitan area. This is no coincidence, as close proximity to a major city provides residents with access to more job opportunities, which in turn can help lower unemployment and improve financial security.

The best cities to live in include ones just outside of Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City, Oklahoma City, Pittsburgh and Washington.

1. Valley, Alabama

• Population: 9,439
• 5 yr. population change: -0.8 percent
• Median home value: $82,900
• Median household income: $39,387

The majority of the cities on this list are relatively wealthy. Valley, Alabama, is an exception. The typical household in Valley earns just $39,387 a year, about $5,000 less than the typical Alabama household. Still, serious financial hardship is less common in Valley than in Alabama as a whole as 15.7 percent of area residents live below the poverty line, well below the 18.4 percent state poverty rate. Valley residents also benefit from a low cost of living as goods and services are about 6 percent less expensive in the city than they are nationwide on average.

Valley is a pilot city for the Alabama Communities of Excellence program, a non-profit that partners with governments, businesses, and universities to prepare participating communities for a more vibrant future.

Ketchikan, Alaska (Photo11: sorincolac / Getty Images)

2. Ketchikan, Alaska

• Population: 8,189
• 5 yr. population change: +2.3 percent
• Median home value: $232,500
• Median household income: $53,937

Health outcomes are an important factor in the overall quality of life in a given area. In Ketchikan, Alaska, the mortality rate of people admitted to the hospital is 12.2 per 100,000 hospital admissions within 30 days. That figure is the lowest of any major metropolitan area in the state. Ketchikan is the only metro area in Alaska with a mortality rate lower than the U.S. mortality rate of 12.9 per 100,000.

Thanks to its scenery along the southeastern coast of Alaska and proximity to the continental United States, Ketchikan is a popular tourist destination, especially on cruises. Though much of Alaska is isolated and rural, Ketchikan offers residents and visitors access to many more entertainment options than most parts of the state – which can be important during the long, dark winters. Ketchikan has more bars, restaurants, and movie theaters than almost anywhere else in the state.

3. Paradise Valley, Arizona

• Population: 13,833
• 5 yr. population change: +5.6 percent
• Median home value: $1,332,600
• Median household income: $173,487

Most houses in Paradise Valley, Arizona, are worth over $1.3 million, more than seven times the U.S. median home value. Paradise Valley residents are able to afford such expensive houses because of their relatively high incomes. The typical household in the city earns $173,487 a year, one of the highest median household incomes in the country.

Paradise Valley lives up to its name as a popular destination to relax. The town is home to several resorts and a number of golf courses. Located just north of Phoenix and Scottsdale, it is also known for its high-end dining and nightlife.

4. Batesville, Arkansas

• Population: 10,579
• 5 yr. population change: +4.5 percent
• Median home value: $120,400
• Median household income: $42,143

Batesville, Arkansas, ranks among the best U.S. cities to live largely due to its affordability and community attractions and amenities. Most homeowners in Batesville pay less than $1,000 a year in property taxes, less than half the amount the typical American homeowner pays. Overall annual housing costs typically come to about $7,500 a year, roughly $4,600 less than the median costs nationwide. Goods and services are 16 percent less expensive on average in Batesville than they are nationwide.

With roots as far back as 1804, Batesville is the second oldest city in Arkansas. The city, which avoided destruction in the Civil War, has a number of historic buildings and sites. There are attractions in the area for nearly every taste and preference, including antique stores, art galleries, an annual film festival, and the Batesville Motor Speedway.

Palos Verdes Estates, California (Photo11: Focqus, LLC / Getty Images)

5. Palos Verdes Estates, California

• Population: 13,582
• 5 yr. population change: +1.3 percent
• Median home value: $1,609,500
• Median household income: $200,766

Located along the Pacific Coast less than 30 miles from Los Angeles, Palos Verdes Estates is the best place in California to live. One of the wealthiest neighborhoods in the country, the typical household earns over $200,000 a year, more than triple the national median household income of $55,322. Crime is virtually unheard of in Palos Verdes Estates as its violent crime rate of 22 incidents per 100,000 people is a small fraction of the national rate of 383 per 100,000.

The high ranking may not come as a surprise to those familiar with it, as it is a master-planned city, designed by the Olmsted Brothers, sons of Frederick Law Olmsted – architect of New York City's Central Park and the Stanford University campus.

6. Frederick, Colorado

• Population: 10,791
• 5 yr. population change: +32.2 percent
• Median home value: $261,500
• Median household income: $90,321

Frederick, a small town about a half hour north of Denver, ranks as Colorado's best city to live in. The town boasts a number of amenities that make it an attractive place to live, including a museum, a golf course, over 20 community parks, 25 skiing areas in driving distance, and over 300 sunny days a year.

Like many communities on this list, Frederick is relatively affluent and fast growing. The typical area household earns $90,321 a year, about $27,800 more than the median income across Colorado as a whole. Additionally, in the last five years, the number of people living in Frederick climbed 32.2 percent. For reference, the U.S. population grew by just 3.9 percent over the same period.

7. Darien, Connecticut

• Population: 21,519
• 5 yr. population change: +4.6 percent
• Median home value: $1,248,200
• Median household income: $208,125

Darien, Connecticut is home to one of the wealthiest and best educated populations in the country. Well over half of all households in Darien earn at least $200,000 a year and about four out of five adults in Darien have a bachelor's degree or higher. Nationwide, fewer than one in three adults have a bachelor's degree. A high median income is bolstered not only by high educational attainment, but also by a strong job market. Just 3.6 percent of workers in Darien were unemployed in 2017, below the 4.7 percent state and 4.4 percent national 2017 unemployment rates.

Darien is also one of the safest communities in the country. There were just 14 violent crimes for every 100,000 residents in 2017, a fraction of the 383 violent crimes per 100,000 people nationwide.

8. Middletown, Delaware

• Population: 20,045
• 5 yr. population change: +13.8 percent
• Median home value: $274,400
• Median household income: $87,250

Middletown ranks as the best community in Delaware to live in. The town boasts several public parks with a range of amenities, including tennis and basketball courts, soccer and baseball fields, pavilions, a track, and a pool. A relatively affluent area, Middletown has a median income of $87,250, about $26,200 more than the median income in Delaware as a whole. Home values are also about 18 percent higher than the average across the state and over half of all homes in Middletown are worth over a quarter-million dollars.

Like many of the cities and towns on this list, Middletown is growing rapidly. In the last five years, Middletown's population climbed 13.8 percent.

9. Pinecrest, Florida

• Population: 19,272
• 5 yr. population change: +5.2 percent
• Median home value: $840,900
• Median household income: $130,900

Pinecrest is by far the wealthiest place in Florida, and one of the wealthiest in the entire country. With a median household income of $130,900, most Pinecrest households earn more than double what the typical Florida household earns, which is $48,900. Partially because of the area's relatively high income, the typical home in Pinecrest costs more than $840,000 – more than four times the median Florida home.

A Miami suburb just off Biscayne Bay, Pinecrest is also one of the best educated areas of the state. Among adults 25 and older, 61.7 percent have at least a bachelor's degree. Statewide, just 27.9 percent of adults finished college.

10. Milton, Georgia

• Population: 36,755
• 5 yr. population change: +19.1 percent
• Median home value: $475,300
• Median household income: $109,784

A planned community incorporated in 2006, Milton is one of the most rapidly growing cities in Georgia. Now home to nearly 37,000 people, Milton's population more than doubled since 2009 and is projected to reach 43,000 by 2030. In commuting distance of Atlanta, many Milton residents likely commute to high paying jobs in the state's largest city. The typical household in Milton earns $109,784 a year, more than double the median income of $51,037 across the state as a whole. Similarly, Milton's poverty rate of 5.5 percent is less than a third of the 17.8 percent statewide poverty rate.

Milton is also a safe city. There were just 23 violent crimes for every 100,000 residents in 2017, a fraction of the 383 per 100,000 national rate.

Honolulu, Hawaii (Photo11: sorincolac / Getty Images)

11. Urban Honolulu, Hawaii

• Population: 349,597
• 5 yr. population change: +4.3 percent
• Median home value: $601,500
• Median household income: $63,361

Education can be an important factor in the health and well being of a population. In addition to being more financial stable, college graduates tend to live longer and healthier lives than those who did not obtain at least a bachelor's degree. A high level of education helps make Urban Honolulu the best city to live in Hawaii. Among Honolulu adults, 36 percent have at least a bachelor's degree, the highest rate in Hawaii.

Long commutes by car can have a negative effect on physical and mental health. Honolulu residents utilize alternative methods of getting to and from work. Roughly one in every eight residents takes public transportation to work, while many others walk or ride their bicycles. Altogether, 22.9 percent of commuters do not drive themselves to their jobs, over five times more than the next closest city in Hawaii.

12. Hailey, Idaho

• Population: 8,058
• 5 yr. population change: +2.6 percent
• Median home value: $266,500
• Median household income: $56,522

Hailey is situated in Idaho's Wood River Valley in the Rocky Mountains. The city is surrounded by public land and forests where residents and visitors can hike, bike, ski, fish, and horseback ride, and is a short drive from Ketchum and Sun Valley, two resort towns.

Quality of life for residents is boosted by lower than average crime, poverty, and unemployment rates. While the median household income of $56,522 in Hailey is only about $1,000 higher than the national median income, a dollar goes further in Hailey than in much of the rest of the country. Goods and services are about 4 percent less expensive than they are nationwide on average.

13. Winnetka, Illinois

• Population: 12,437
• 5 yr. population change: +2.3 percent
• Median home value: $989,600
• Median household income: $207,857

Winnetka is a small village that sits on the shores of Lake Michigan about 15 miles north of downtown Chicago. One of the wealthiest cities in the state, the typical Winnetka household earns $207,857 a year. Winnetka residents working in Chicago have options when it comes to transit, as over one quarter of commuters use public transportation – an alternative most Americans do not have.

In the village, downtown shops were described by the Chicago Tribune in 2012 as reminiscent of the Hamptons on Long Island in New York, without the celebrities. Winnetka boasts four beaches, a boat launch, several parks, a tennis club, a golf course, an ice rink, and forest preserve areas, all open to the public.

14. Jasper, Indiana

• Population: 15,790
• 5 yr. population change: +6.6 percent
• Median home value: $148,200
• Median household income: $55,209

Jasper is one of the most affordable places to live in Indiana. The cost of living in the city is just 83.6 percent of what the typical American pays. The median household income in Jasper of $55,209 is higher than Indiana's median of $50,433. The combination of relatively high income and low costs, as compared to the rest of the state, makes Jasper residents more able to afford homes compared to those in most other areas of Indiana. The median home price in Jasper is $148,200, compared to Indiana's median home price of $126,500.

Jasper residents are much less likely to struggle with money than the average Indiana resident. Statewide, 15 percent of Indiana residents live in poverty. In Jasper, the poverty rate is less than half that, at 7.1 percent.

15. Le Mars, Iowa

• Population: 9,826
• 5 yr. population change: +1.0 percent
• Median home value: $139,400
• Median household income: $56,851

Le Mars, Iowa, is among the most affordable cities in the United States. Goods and services in the city cost about 15 percent less on average than they do nationwide. Housing is particularly inexpensive, with the typical household spending $8,124 a year, about $4,000 less than the average annual housing cost nationwide.

The city also has its share of attractions. Home to a Blue Bunny ice cream manufacturing plant, Le Mars churns out more ice cream from a single company than any other city, earning the nickname "The Ice Cream Capital of the World." The city and surrounding area also boast a history museum, an art museum, a golf course, a campground, and of course, an ice cream museum.

McPherson, Kansas (Photo11: BOB WESTON / Getty Images)

16. McPherson, Kansas

• Population: 13,212
• 5 yr. population change: +0.0 percent
• Median home value: $135,800
• Median household income: $54,057

The median household income in McPherson, Kansas of $54,057 a year is just below the national median of $55,322. However, a dollar goes a long way in McPherson as goods and services are 14 percent less expensive than they are on average nationwide. Indeed, extreme financial hardship is relatively rare in the city. Just 7.3 percent of residents live in poverty compared to 13.3 percent of the Kansas population.

McPherson residents also have many options when it comes to entertainment and recreation. The city has a far greater than typical concentration of restaurants, fitness centers, museums, golf courses, and movie theatres.

17. Edgewood, Kentucky

• Population: 8,703
• 5 yr. population change: +0.5 percent
• Median home value: $204,300
• Median household income: $89,073

The best city to live in in Kentucky, Edgewood is both wealthy and affordable. The typical household in Edgewood earns $89,073, nearly double the $44,811 median income across the state as a whole. Additionally, goods and services are about 11 percent less expensive in Edgewood than they are nationwide on average.

Overall quality of life in Edgewood is boosted by two large public parks and an easily accessible hospital and medical care center within city limits. Located about seven miles south of Cincinnati across the Ohio River, Edgewood – like many cities on this list – is in commuting distance of a major metropolitan area.

18. Youngsville, Louisiana

• Population: 10,878
• 5 yr. population change: +41.5 percent
• Median home value: $222,300
• Median household income: $94,564

Youngsville is a relatively prosperous city in one of the poorest states in the country. The typical Youngsville household earns about $95,000 a year and just 5.5 percent of the population live in poverty. Meanwhile, the typical Louisiana household earns less than $46,000 a year and nearly one in five state residents live in poverty. A dollar also goes farther than typical in Youngsville, as goods and services are about 7 percent less expensive than they are on average nationwide.

Youngsville residents have benefitted from a 70 acre, multimillion dollar sports complex since its completion in 2014 and a recreation center that opened in 2016. The facility boasts 10 tennis courts, six soccer fields, five baseball fields, batting cages, a fishing pond, a one-mile walking path, and a playground.

19. Bath, Maine

• Population: 8,334
• 5 yr. population change: -3.6 percent
• Median home value: $164,600
• Median household income: $42,275

Bath is the best place to live in Maine. Bolstered largely by Bath Iron Works, a shipbuilding plant operated by defense giant General Dynamics, the city's job market is relatively strong. Annual unemployment in the city, located near the mouth of the Kennebec River, stands at 3.2 percent, well below the 4.4 percent national rate. Many residents also benefit from the city's walkability as more than one in 10 commuters in Bath walk to work, more than triple the comparable national share. The city is also relatively safe, and also has a high concentration of restaurants, fitness centers, museums, and libraries.

Despite its advantages, Bath is one of only a handful of cities on this list to be shrinking in size. Over the last five years, Bath's population declined by 3.6 percent, even as the total U.S. population grew 3.9 percent.

20. Bowie, Maryland

• Population: 57,633
• 5 yr. population change: +5.7 percent
• Median home value: $303,900
• Median household income: $106,098

Just a short commute from Washington, D.C., Bowie, Maryland, provides easy access to high-paying jobs in and around the nation's capital. Most households in Bowie earn more than $106,000 per year – over $30,000 higher than Maryland's state median household income. Just a small share of Bowie residents live in poverty. Its poverty rate is just 3.3 percent, just one-third of the state's poverty rate.

In order to qualify for these high-level jobs, many of Bowie's residents are well-educated. Nearly half of all adults living in Bowie hold at least a college degree, as compared to 38.4 percent of Maryland residents overall.

21. Winchester, Massachusetts

• Population: 22,491
• 5 yr. population change: +6.1 percent
• Median home value: $796,500
• Median household income: $149,321

Winchester is the best-educated place in Massachusetts and one of the most highly-educated in the entire country. Nearly three-quarters of adults in the area have at least a bachelor's degree. This college degree attainment rate is well above that of Massachusetts, which sits at 41.2 percent.

This high level of education, coupled with the fact that Winchester is just outside of Boston, can make it easier for residents to find jobs. Winchester has the lowest unemployment rate, at 2.7 percent, of anywhere in the state. Massachusetts' unemployment rate is a full percentage point higher. This high level of employment likely helps drive down the poverty rate in Winchester. Just 2.4 percent of Winchester residents live below the poverty line, the lowest share in Massachusetts.

22. East Grand Rapids, Michigan

• Population: 11,297
• 5 yr. population change: +5.2 percent
• Median home value: $303,400
• Median household income: $118,393

East Grand Rapids is one of the wealthiest cities in both Michigan and the United States. The typical area household earns over $118,000 a year, compared to the $55,322 the typical household earns nationwide. City residents also benefit from a low cost of living as goods and services are 7 percent less expensive in East Grand Rapids than they are on average nationwide.

In addition to entertainment and cultural attractions in nearby Grand Rapids, East Grand Rapids has 10 parks, including a lake with a boat launch, miles of trails, playgrounds, and a baseball field.

23. New Ulm, Minnesota

• Population: 13,279
• 5 yr. population change: -1.6 percent
• Median home value: $133,100
• Median household income: $52,244

Residents of New Ulm, Minnesota, are more likely to work and be financially secure, on average, than most other Americans. The town's poverty rate of 8.5 percent is well below the national poverty rate of 15.1 percent. Also, the town's five-year average unemployment rate of 2.6 percent is 4.8 percentage points below the comparable nationwide rate.

These numbers are better than the comparable national figures despite the fact that New Ulm residents tend to not be especially wealthy. The town's median household income of $52,244 a year is several thousand dollars lower than the U.S. median household income. Unlike almost all other places on this list, New Ulm's population shrank over the past five years. During a time when the U.S. population grew 3.9 percent, New Ulm's population dropped 1.6 percent.

24. Madison, Mississippi

• Population: 25,473
• 5 yr. population change: +7.1 percent
• Median home value: $243,500
• Median household income: $100,978

Madison, a city located along a reservoir less than 20 miles north of the state capital, ranks as Mississippi's best city to live in. Madison is a relatively wealthy community, with a median income of $100,978 – more than double the $40,528 median income statewide. The average cost of living in Madison is also about 8 percent lower than it is nationwide.

Madison residents have access to several public parks with amenities that include an archery range, baseball and soccer fields, walking trails, batting cages, and an outdoor learning center.

25. Ladue, Missouri

• Population: 8,579
• 5 yr. population change: +1.1 percent
• Median home value: $771,500
• Median household income: $186,371

One of the wealthiest cities in Missouri, Ladue's median household income of $186,371 a year is more than triple the national median income of $55,322. Not only is Ladue a wealthy city, but it is also inexpensive. Goods and services are 11 percent cheaper on average in Ladue than they are typically nationwide.

With easy access to jobs in nearby St. Louis, Ladue residents who want a job generally have no trouble finding one. Over the last five years, unemployment stood at just 2.0 percent in the city, a fraction of the national rate of 7.4 percent. In addition to cultural attractions and entertainment venues in St. Louis, Ladue residents enjoy a greater than typical concentration of restaurants, fitness and recreation centers, golf courses, and museums within their own city limits.

26. Miles City, Montana

• Population: 8,667
• 5 yr. population change: +3.6 percent
• Median home value: $130,100
• Median household income: $47,383

Miles City is the least expensive place to live in Montana. The city has the lowest property taxes at just $1,480 per year, as well as the least expensive median monthly housing cost at $655. Though Miles City's $47,383 median household income is one of the lower such figures in Montana, a relatively small share of residents are impoverished. The area's poverty rate of 13.5 percent is one of the lowest in the state, and well below Montana's statewide poverty rate of 14.9 percent.

Miles City ranks as Montana's best city to live in part because it is the safest place in the state. Its violent crime rate of 104 reported incidents per 100,000 residents is less than half the rate of the next safest place in the state. Miles City also has Montana's lowest property crime rate.

27. Norfolk, Nebraska

• Population: 24,398
• 5 yr. population change: +1.9 percent
• Median home value: $123,200
• Median household income: $45,401

Norfolk is a small city of just under 25,000 in northeastern Nebraska. A relatively safe city, Norfolk's violent crime rate of 148 incidents per 100,000 residents is less than half the national rate of 383 per 100,000. Though the typical household in Norfolk earns just $45,401 a year, about $10,000 less than the typical American household, a dollar goes a long way in Norfolk. Goods and services in and around the area are about 14.5 percent less expensive than they are nationwide on average.

Elko, Nevada (Photo11: jmoor17 / Getty Images)

28. Elko, Nevada

• Population: 20,078
• 5 yr. population change: +11.0 percent
• Median home value: $215,100
• Median household income: $76,826

Elko has by far the highest median household income of anywhere in Nevada. No other area in the state came within $20,000 of Elko's median household income of $76,826. Although Elko residents tend to earn a relatively high amount, it is the least expensive place to live in Nevada. The cost of living in Elko is just 83.9 percent of what it costs in the typical American city.

Elko is the fastest-growing place in Nevada by a wide margin. In the past seven years, its population increased 18.7 percent to just over 20,000 people. During that same timeframe, no other place in the state had a population increase of more than 10 percent.

29. Hanover, New Hampshire

• Population: 8,482
• 5 yr. population change: +0.0 percent
• Median home value: $469,300
• Median household income: $96,406

Hanover has numerous advantages over other places in New Hampshire cities. Its median household income of $96,406 is more than $26,000 higher than the next closest city and well ahead of the statewide median, which is $68,485. Hanover is also the best educated place in the state, as 83.1 percent of adults hold at least a bachelor's degree. No other city in New Hampshire comes close to that share. For comparison, the state's bachelor's degree attainment rate is 35.5 percent.

With a population of 8,482, Hanover is a smaller city. As such, many residents are able to walk to and from work. Walking not only provides numerous health benefits, but also helps decrease road traffic and reduce pollution. Some 40 percent of Hanover residents commute by walking – by far the highest rate in New Hampshire and the second highest rate of any U.S. city.

30. Haddonfield, New Jersey

• Population: 11,444
• 5 yr. population change: -1.3 percent
• Median home value: $487,700
• Median household income: $135,700

Haddonfield is one of the most economically prosperous places in New Jersey and the United States as a whole. The typical Haddonfield home earns $135,700, nearly $62,000 more than the typical New Jersey household. Haddonfield lies just across the Delaware River from Philadelphia, providing its residents access to the jobs that city offers.

Compared to the rest of the state, Haddonfield residents are not likely to struggle with poverty. The area has a poverty rate of just 2.9 percent, well below New Jersey's poverty rate of 10.9 percent. Though Haddonfield's cost of living is 11 percent more than that of the average American city, it is still one of the lowest in New Jersey.

31. Los Alamos, New Mexico

• Population: 11,733
• 5 yr. population change: -2.9 percent
• Median home value: $277,700
• Median household income: $101,535

Los Alamos, New Mexico is flush with history, cultural amenities, and parks. These include a science museum, a theatre, nearly 100 public art installations, a network of over 90 miles of hiking trails, and the Manhattan Project National Historical Park – a monument to the city's critical role in World War II and development of the atomic bomb. Los Alamos also has one of the best public high schools in New Mexico, according to U.S. News & World Report.

Many living in the area work at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, a facility run by the U.S. Department of Energy with a $2.6 billion budget primarily allocated to weapons development.

Croton-on-Hudson, New York (Photo11: ricardocostaphotography / Getty Images)

32. Croton-on-Hudson, New York

• Population: 8,209
• 5 yr. population change: +2.8 percent
• Median home value: $519,400
• Median household income: $117,656

Croton-on-Hudson is a small village on the eastern bank of the Hudson River, less than 40 miles north of Manhattan. The village is on a train line that goes directly into the city, and largely as a result, more than one in every four workers in Croton-on-Hudson commute using public transit. The village's proximity to New York City contributes to high property values as most homes in the community are worth over half a million dollars.

Croton-on-Hudson is one of the safest communities in New York. There were just 48 violent crimes for every 100,000 village residents in 2017, about an eighth of the national violent crime rate of 383 per 100,000.

33. Morrisville, North Carolina

• Population: 22,600
• 5 yr. population change: +30.5 percent
• Median home value: $291,400
• Median household income: $92,769

Morrisville is situated in the middle of North Carolina's "Research Triangle." The cities of Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill are each home to a major scientific research university – North Carolina State University, Duke University, and the University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, respectively – and several major research-intensive industries have developed in the area.

Morrisville offers close access to each of the three universities, as well as the companies that are located nearby. Morrisville is one of the fastest-growing communities in the entire country. In the past five years, its population grew more than 30 percent, from just over 13,000 to 22,600.

34. Mandan, North Dakota

• Population: 20,613
• 5 yr. population change: +14.2 percent
• Median home value: $175,400
• Median household income: $60,034

Residents of Mandan, North Dakota benefit from a low cost of living – 13 percent lower than average nationwide – a five-year average unemployment rate of 2.0 percent, and a violent crime rate that is less than half the national rate. Mandan residents also have access to jobs, entertainment, and cultural attractions in Bismarck, the state capital located on the opposite side the Missouri River.

Recently, business leaders, elected officials, and ordinary citizens established a committee to form a comprehensive plan to improve Mandan over the coming decade. The committee's accomplishments include broadened business support and incentives, the creation of annual festivals and events, public education improvements, and increased communication regarding local elections.

35. New Albany, Ohio

• Population: 9,384
• 5 yr. population change: +25.3 percent
• Median home value: $492,400
• Median household income: $191,375

New Albany, Ohio, is one of the most affluent cities in the country. The median household income of $191,375 is one of the five highest of U.S. cities. Wealthier areas tend to have a number of livability advantages over low-income cities, including lower crime rates. There were just 36.9 violent crimes reported per 100,000 residents in New Albany, less than a tenth of the nationwide crime rate. New Albany also has many amenities for residents, including over 600 acres of parks and sports fields.

There are a number of factors that can draw people to certain towns, including jobs, schools, and amenities. New Albany excels in many of these aspects, and its population growth rate reflects that. The town's population grew by more than 25 percent over the past five years, compared to the national growth rate of just 3.9 percent.

36. Newcastle, Oklahoma

• Population: 9,030
• 5 yr. population change: +21.0 percent
• Median home value: $180,300
• Median household income: $78,144

Newcastle is a small city of less than 10,000 just outside Oklahoma City. One of the fastest growing cities in the state, Newcastle's population spiked by 21 percent in the last five years. As in other cities on this list, Newcastle residents are actively engaged in bettering their community. The city's resident-driven Bridge to 2020 initiative launched in 2007 to develop a long-term strategic plan for the community. In addition to nearby amenities in Oklahoma City, Newcastle boasts seven golf courses, six movie theatres, access to four hospitals, and two shopping malls.

A relatively affluent city, Newcastle's median income of $78,144 is about $30,000 higher than it is statewide and goods and services are about 17 percent less expensive than they are nationwide.

37. Sherwood, Oregon

• Population: 18,965
• 5 yr. population change: +7.5 percent
• Median home value: $313,000
• Median household income: $86,111

Sherwood is a small city about 15 miles southwest of Portland. In addition to amenities, attractions, and employment opportunities in the nearby city, Sherwood itself boasts over a dozen parks and a community recreation center and pool.

Quality of life in Sherwood is also bolstered by a low violent crime rate and relative financial stability. There were just 82 violent crimes for every 100,000 residents in Sherwood in 2017, less than a quarter the national violent crime rate. Additionally, Sherwood's 4.7 percent poverty rate is less than a third of both the state and national poverty rates of 15.7 percent and 15.1 percent, respectively.

38. Franklin Park, Pennsylvania

• Population: 14,228
• 5 yr. population change: +7.9 percent
• Median home value: $312,200
• Median household income: $121,661

Franklin Park, Pennsylvania, is a borough just outside of Pittsburgh. The area has a relatively high share of residents with high educational attainment. A whopping 70 percent of adults hold at least a bachelor's degree, one of the higher college attainment rates among U.S. cities. Those with college degrees are more qualified for specialized jobs that tend to have higher salaries. In Franklin Park, the median household income of $121,661 a year is one of the highest in the country.

Like many affluent, well-educated areas, Franklin Park is relatively safe. The violent crime rate of 14 incidents per 100,000 people is one of the lowest in the country. Nationwide, there were 383 violent crimes for every 100,000 people in 2017.

Newport, Rhode Island (Photo11: DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images)

39. Newport, Rhode Island

• Population: 24,570
• 5 yr. population change: -0.1 percent
• Median home value: $382,200
• Median household income: $59,794

Newport, Rhode Island is by far the best educated city in the state. More than half – 50.9 percent – of adult residents completed at least their bachelor's degree. No other major Rhode Island community exceeded the state's college graduation rate of 32.5 percent. This high educational attainment qualifies many of the city's residents for highly skilled jobs and likely helps drive down the unemployment rate. Newport's unemployment rate is just 3.8 percent, the lowest of anywhere in the country.

Though Newport's median household income is close to that of Rhode Island as a whole, homes in the area tend to be much more valuable than those in the rest of the state. Newport's median home value is $382,200, well above Rhode Island's $238,200 median home value.

40. Tega Cay, South Carolina

• Population: 9,026
• 5 yr. population change: +23.3 percent
• Median home value: $301,200
• Median household income: $120,346

Tega Cay ranks as one of the best cities to live in part because of its relatively high income and the many associated benefits that come with affluence. The city's median household income of over $120,000 is more than double the U.S. median. In a city with a high percentage of affluent households, there are also very few residents struggling with serious financial hardship. Just 0.9 percent of residents live in poverty.

Tega Cay lies near the border of the Carolinas and Lake Wiley. The water access gives residents a chance to swim, boat, and fish. As a tourist destination, the city has a high number of bars and restaurants per resident. Tega Cay is growing quickly. It was home to fewer than 5,000 people in 2009. As of 2016, more than 9,000 people lived there.

41. Pierre, South Dakota

• Population: 13,959
• 5 yr. population change: +2.2 percent
• Median home value: $164,900
• Median household income: $54,868

Most American homeowners spend more than $12,000 per year on housing. In Pierre, South Dakota, most spend less than $8,500 annually. Overall, the cost of living is lower in Pierre, as goods and services are 15 percent less expensive than they are on average nationwide.

Pierre, South Dakota's capital, is home to many outdoor amenities largely thanks to its proximity to the Missouri River. Nearby Farm Island and LaFramboise Island offer residents the opportunity to take part in outdoor activities like swimming and hiking.

42. Atoka, Tennessee

• Population: 8,917
• 5 yr. population change: +11.9 percent
• Median home value: $172,400
• Median household income: $87,047

Many cities and towns on this list are in close proximity to a major metropolitan area. About 25 miles northeast of Memphis, Atoka is one of them. In addition to attractions and amenities in Memphis, Atoka itself has several parks featuring playgrounds, sports fields, picnic areas, and a fishing pond.

A safe community, Atoka's violent crime rate of 152 incidents per 100,000 people is less than half the national violent crime rate. Safe streets and proximity to a major city make Atoka an attractive place for new residents and families, and in the last five years, the city's population expanded by 11.9 percent, triple the comparable 3.9 percent national growth rate.

43. West University Place, Texas

• Population: 15,318
• 5 yr. population change: +4.0 percent
• Median home value: $917,800
• Median household income: $220,868

A wealthy suburb of Houston, West University Place ranks as the best city to live in Texas. A wealthy city, the median household income of nearly $221,000 a year is nearly four times the income the typical American household earns. A dollar also goes far in the city as goods and services are about 5 percent less expensive than they are nationwide on average. In addition to entertainment and culture in nearby Houston, West University has a far greater concentration of restaurants, bars, fitness centers, museums and theatre companies than is typical nationwide.

West University is also a safe city with a strong job market. The city's violent crime rate of 64 incidents for every 100,000 people is among the lowest in the nation, as is the five-year average unemployment rate of 2.7 percent.

44. Woods Cross, Utah

• Population: 10,930
• 5 yr. population change: +15.5 percent
• Median home value: $226,200
• Median household income: $78,750

Just north of Salt Lake City, Woods Cross provides easy access to Utah's largest city, as well as the Great Salt Lake to the west and Grandview Peak to the east. The proximity to Salt Lake City affords Woods Cross residents a short commute to the city, which may help bolster the city's labor force participation rate. More than three quarters of Woods Cross adults, 77.4 percent, participate in the labor force, the most of any Utah community.

This high labor force participation likely helps drive up the median household income. The typical Woods Cross household earns $78,750 each year, well ahead of Utah's $62,518 median household income.

South Burlington, Vermont (Photo11: vermontalm / Getty Images)

45. South Burlington, Vermont

• Population: 18,704
• 5 yr. population change: +6.2 percent
• Median home value: $271,900
• Median household income: $66,728

Sitting along Lake Champlain, South Burlington is adjacent to Burlington, the largest city in Vermont. With access to a number of nearby colleges, including Champlain College and the University of Vermont, South Burlington's population is well educated. Over half of all the city's adult residents have a bachelor's degree or higher, well above the 30.3 percent national bachelor's degree attainment rate. There are a range of employment opportunities in the area, including the University of Vermont Medical Center. Just 2.0 percent of workers in South Burlington were unemployed in 2017, below both the 3.0 percent state and 4.4 percent national unemployment rates.

A strong job market bolsters the financial security of area residents. Just 6.2 percent of South Burlington's population live in poverty, less than half the 15.1 percent national poverty rate.

46. Waynesboro, Virginia

• Population: 21,366
• 5 yr. population change: +1.7 percent
• Median home value: $158,800
• Median household income: $45,097

Waynesboro, an independent city in Virginia, is notable for its affordability, safety, and scenic beauty. Goods and services in the city are about 7 percent less expensive than they are nationwide on average. Additionally, the violent crime rate of 182 incidents per 100,000 people is less than half the U.S. violent crime rate of 383 per 100,000.

Located in the Shenandoah Valley, Waynesboro offers easy access to the scenic Blue Ridge Parkway and the Appalachian Trail. The South River cuts through the city, providing a water trail for residents to fish and enjoy by boat. Waynesboro also has a higher than typical concentration of restaurants, movie theatres, and museums.

47. Snoqualmie, Washington

• Population: 12,510
• 5 yr. population change: +28.3 percent
• Median home value: $471,800
• Median household income: $131,453

Snoqualmie, Washington, is one of the safest places in the country, with just 15 violent crimes for every 100,000 city residents in 2017. The town's property crime rate of 1,077 incidents per 100,000 residents is also less than half the national rate.

Areas with higher median household incomes tend to have less crime than lower income areas. The median annual household income in Snoqualmie, which is within commuting distance of Seattle, is $131,453 a year, one of the higher incomes among American cities. In addition to the culture and entertainment Seattle has to offer, Snoqualmie has a higher than typical concentration of restaurants, bars, museums, and movie theatres.

Bridgeport, West Virginia (Photo11: NoDerog / Getty Images)

48. Bridgeport, West Virginia

• Population: 8,364
• 5 yr. population change: +3.9 percent
• Median home value: $199,000
• Median household income: $80,462

In Bridgeport, 45.3 percent of adults have graduated from college, nearly the highest share of cities in the state. The high college attainment rate has likely contributed to the town's relatively high median household income of $80,462 a year. Not only is Bridgeport wealthy, but it is also inexpensive. Goods and services are 15 percent less expensive than average in the city.

When it comes to culture and entertainment, Bridgeport residents have options. The city is home to a far higher concentration of restaurants, bars, recreation centers, golf courses, and movie theatres than is typical nationwide.

49. Whitefish Bay, Wisconsin

• Population: 14,088
• 5 yr. population change: +0.4 percent
• Median home value: $350,700
• Median household income: $105,156

Whitefish Bay, a Milwaukee suburb along the shore of Lake Michigan, ranks as the best place to live in Wisconsin. The high quality of life in Whitefish Bay is partially the result of a strong job market. The area's average unemployment rate over the last five years stands at just 3.2 percent – less than half the comparable nationwide rate of of 7.4 percent.

Whitefish Bay is also one of the safest communities in the country, with a violent crime rate of just 36 incidents per 100,000 people. For reference, there were 383 violent crimes per 100,000 people nationwide in 2017.

50. Jackson, Wyoming

• Population: 10,279
• 5 yr. population change: +7.6 percent
• Median home value: $573,400
• Median household income: $70,517

The resort town of Jackson ranks as the best place to live in Wyoming. Jackson boasts a high concentration of restaurants, bars, museums, and movie theatres, as well as access to Jackson Hole, one of the most famous ski resorts in the United States.

Incomes are relatively high in Jackson. The typical area household earns $70,517 a year, about $11,000 more than the typical Wyoming household. Higher incomes are not enough to offset the area's high cost of living, however, as goods and services are about 35 percent more expensive in Jackson than they are on average nationwide. Housing is particularly expensive as most area homes are worth over half a million dollars.

Methodology

To identify the best cities to live in every state, 24/7 Wall St. created a weighted index of 26 measures that fall into one of four categories: affordability, economy, quality of life, and community.

In the affordability category, the ratio of the median home value to the median income was given full weight. Cities where the median home value is closer to the median household income were rewarded. Cost of living, as determined by the average cost of goods and services in an area relative to the nation as a whole, was given a full weight. Property taxes are largely levied at the local level, and cities where residents pay more property taxes as a percentage of their home value were penalized. Property taxes were given a one-quarter weighting.

In the economy category, we gave median household income full weighting. The unemployment rate was also given a full weight. We used five-year average unemployment due to lack of comparable annual data at local levels. Two-year employment growth and share of the total working age population with a job were each given a half weight, favoring areas with more and growing jobs opportunities.

In the quality of life category, the poverty rate was given a full weight, penalizing cities where serious financial hardship is more common. The share of the population that struggles to put food on the table either due to low income or distance from a grocery store, known as the food insecurity rate, was given full weight. A city's mortality rate, calculated as the number of people who died while in hospital care per hospital by city, was also given full weight. In cases where city-level data was not available, mortality rates were imputed from county-level data.

The drug overdose mortality rate was given a one-quarter weighting, as was the hospital readmission rate, or the share of those released from the hospital who were readmitted within 30 days. Distance from the center of the city to the nearest hospital was given full weight.
Measures used in the community category include the average travel time to work, which was given full weight. The violent crime rate – the total number of rapes, robberies, murders, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 people – was given full weight. So too was the property crime rate, which is the total number of burglaries, larcenies, motor vehicle thefts, and incidents of arson per 100,000 people.

The share of commuters either walking, cycling, or taking public transit to work was given half weight. The total number of colleges in the area and the number of restaurants, bars, museums, theatre companies, movie theatres, libraries, and parks per capita were each given a one-quarter weighting.

The number of hospitalizations that would have been prevented by regularly scheduled doctor visits for every 1,000 Medicare enrollees – known as the preventable hospitalization rate – was given half weighting.

Median household income, median home value, average travel time to work, poverty rate, population, employment-to-population ratio, median property taxes paid, and average unemployment rate are all five-year estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey and are for 2016. Overall cost of living is for 2014 and comes from data analysis and aggregation company ATTOM Data Solutions.

The population-adjusted number of entertainment and cultural venues like restaurants and museums comes from the Census Bureau's County Business Patterns data set, and is for 2016. The number of colleges comes from the Department of Education College Navigator and is as of the 2017-2018 school year.

Violent and property crime rates are from the FBI's 2017 Uniform Crime Report. Drug overdose mortality rates are from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and are for the years 2014-2016. Mortality rates and hospital readmission rates are from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and are as of June 2015. Preventable hospitalizations are from the latest release from County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute joint program.

24/7 Wall Street is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news and commentary. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.

CLOSE

After sifting through data and numerous living factors, the list of the best cities to live in the U.S. for a $55,000 salary has been revealed. Buzz 60's Justin Kircher has more. Buzz60

 

Friday, February 22, 2019

Essex Investment Management Co. LLC Purchases Shares of 30,318 Crown Crafts, Inc. (CRWS)

Essex Investment Management Co. LLC purchased a new stake in Crown Crafts, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRWS) during the fourth quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The fund purchased 30,318 shares of the textile maker’s stock, valued at approximately $164,000.

Separately, Renaissance Technologies LLC boosted its position in Crown Crafts by 17.2% in the second quarter. Renaissance Technologies LLC now owns 356,440 shares of the textile maker’s stock valued at $2,032,000 after buying an additional 52,340 shares in the last quarter. 37.83% of the stock is owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

Get Crown Crafts alerts:

CRWS has been the topic of a number of recent analyst reports. DA Davidson initiated coverage on shares of Crown Crafts in a research report on Thursday, November 29th. They issued a “neutral” rating and a $6.50 price target on the stock. ValuEngine lowered shares of Crown Crafts from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Thursday, January 10th.

Shares of CRWS stock opened at $5.66 on Friday. Crown Crafts, Inc. has a 1 year low of $5.00 and a 1 year high of $6.60. The company has a market cap of $55.88 million, a PE ratio of 9.86 and a beta of 0.69. The company has a current ratio of 3.46, a quick ratio of 1.48 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.05.

Crown Crafts (NASDAQ:CRWS) last announced its earnings results on Thursday, February 7th. The textile maker reported $0.15 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, hitting the Zacks’ consensus estimate of $0.15. Crown Crafts had a net margin of 6.30% and a return on equity of 14.27%. The company had revenue of $18.67 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $19.70 million. Research analysts predict that Crown Crafts, Inc. will post 0.53 EPS for the current year.

The business also recently announced a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, April 5th. Stockholders of record on Friday, March 15th will be given a dividend of $0.08 per share. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Thursday, March 14th. This represents a $0.32 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 5.65%. Crown Crafts’s payout ratio is 59.26%.

ILLEGAL ACTIVITY NOTICE: “Essex Investment Management Co. LLC Purchases Shares of 30,318 Crown Crafts, Inc. (CRWS)” was originally published by Ticker Report and is the sole property of of Ticker Report. If you are accessing this piece of content on another website, it was copied illegally and reposted in violation of international copyright & trademark laws. The original version of this piece of content can be accessed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4170547/essex-investment-management-co-llc-purchases-shares-of-30318-crown-crafts-inc-crws.html.

About Crown Crafts

Crown Crafts, Inc, through its subsidiaries, operates in the consumer products industry in the United States and internationally. It provides infant, toddler, and juvenile products, including infant and toddler beddings; blankets and swaddle blankets; nursery and toddler accessories; room décors; reusable and disposable bibs; burp cloths; hooded bath towels and washcloths; reusable and disposable placemats, and floor mats; disposable toilet seat covers and changing mats; developmental toys; feeding and care goods; and other infant, toddler, and juvenile soft goods.

Further Reading: Diversification in Your Portfolio

Want to see what other hedge funds are holding CRWS? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Crown Crafts, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRWS).

Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Crown Crafts (NASDAQ:CRWS)

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

AlarmCom Hldg Inc (ALRM) Receives Consensus Recommendation of “Buy” from Analysts

AlarmCom Hldg Inc (NASDAQ:ALRM) has earned an average recommendation of “Buy” from the fourteen analysts that are presently covering the company, MarketBeat Ratings reports. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, one has issued a hold rating, ten have given a buy rating and one has issued a strong buy rating on the company. The average 1 year price target among analysts that have issued ratings on the stock in the last year is $58.22.

Several analysts have recently weighed in on ALRM shares. Jefferies Financial Group boosted their target price on AlarmCom to $60.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Thursday, November 8th. ValuEngine upgraded AlarmCom from a “buy” rating to a “strong-buy” rating in a research report on Monday, February 4th. Zacks Investment Research upgraded AlarmCom from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $58.00 price target on the stock in a research report on Tuesday, January 1st. BidaskClub upgraded AlarmCom from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Thursday, January 17th. Finally, Raymond James boosted their price target on AlarmCom from $55.00 to $58.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Thursday, November 8th.

Get AlarmCom alerts:

In other AlarmCom news, CFO Steve Valenzuela sold 5,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Wednesday, November 28th. The stock was sold at an average price of $49.00, for a total transaction of $245,000.00. Following the transaction, the chief financial officer now owns 37,774 shares in the company, valued at approximately $1,850,926. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through the SEC website. Also, VP Daniel Ramos sold 5,446 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Tuesday, December 4th. The stock was sold at an average price of $50.77, for a total value of $276,493.42. Following the transaction, the vice president now owns 24,902 shares in the company, valued at approximately $1,264,274.54. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders sold a total of 82,221 shares of company stock worth $4,400,514 in the last 90 days. 37.10% of the stock is currently owned by insiders.

Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently added to or reduced their stakes in the business. DekaBank Deutsche Girozentrale increased its position in AlarmCom by 202.9% during the 3rd quarter. DekaBank Deutsche Girozentrale now owns 2,302 shares of the software maker’s stock worth $128,000 after purchasing an additional 1,542 shares during the period. Winslow Evans & Crocker Inc. acquired a new position in AlarmCom during the 4th quarter worth approximately $130,000. We Are One Seven LLC acquired a new position in AlarmCom during the 4th quarter worth approximately $167,000. Modera Wealth Management LLC acquired a new position in AlarmCom during the 3rd quarter worth approximately $210,000. Finally, Riverhead Capital Management LLC increased its position in AlarmCom by 168.8% during the 3rd quarter. Riverhead Capital Management LLC now owns 4,300 shares of the software maker’s stock worth $247,000 after purchasing an additional 2,700 shares during the period. Institutional investors own 97.54% of the company’s stock.

Shares of AlarmCom stock remained flat at $$65.01 on Wednesday. The stock had a trading volume of 287,911 shares, compared to its average volume of 553,531. AlarmCom has a fifty-two week low of $33.39 and a fifty-two week high of $65.58. The stock has a market cap of $3.12 billion, a P/E ratio of 85.54, a P/E/G ratio of 3.35 and a beta of 1.48.

About AlarmCom

Alarm.com Holdings, Inc provides cloud-based software platform solutions for smart residential and commercial properties in the United States and internationally. The company provides interactive security solutions to control and monitor their security systems, as well as connected security devices, including door locks, motion sensors, thermostats, garage doors, and video cameras; and high definition video monitoring solutions, such as live streaming, smart clip capture, secure cloud storage, video alerts, continuous HD recording, and commercial video surveillance solutions.

Read More: Cost of Debt

Analyst Recommendations for AlarmCom (NASDAQ:ALRM)

Monday, February 18, 2019

3 Things to Know About Social Security if You’re Divorced

Did you know Social Security spousal benefits extend to certain ex-spouses who have gotten divorced?

Social Security benefits currently provide half or more of the income received in retirement for 69% of unmarried Americans and 48% of married couples, according to the Social Security Administration (SSA). So it's a good idea to know as much as you can about the benefits you're entitled to receive, especially if you're single.

Wedding cake with bride and groom facing away from each other.

Image source: Getty Images.

Divorced after 10 years and single? You may be eligible for spousal benefits

You may be eligible for a spousal benefit if you are currently single but were divorced after 10 years of marriage or more. You may be entitled to claim Social Security spousal benefits on your ex-partner's work record. For you to do so, your ex-spouse must be eligible for Social Security, and must be at least 62 years of age.

Although folks become eligible to receive Social Security at 62, it's possible that your ex may not choose to start receiving benefits then. Why? Because recipients receive roughly 8% more in Social Security benefits  for every year they delay receiving benefits between 62 and the age of 70. Plus people don't reach full retirement age (FRA) until sometime between the age of 65 (for those born in 1937 or before) and 67 (for those born in 1960 and later), with incremental hikes for those born between those years.

But whether your ex is receiving Social Security or not is of no concern to you as a divorced spouse. As long as your ex-spouse qualifies for benefits and is 62 or older, you may be eligible for spousal benefits, whether your ex is receiving them or not. Your ex-spouse's marital status doesn't matter. They can be remarried, divorced again, or have stayed single -- it doesn't have any bearing on your ability to file a claim, or how much it will be. Nor will your claim have any effect on the amount of your ex's benefits. If they've remarried, the new partner's potential benefit amounts are not affected either.

If your ex has not yet applied for Social Security benefits, however, there is a requirement that you need to have been divorced a minimum of two years to receive the spousal benefit.

So far, so clear. But there are three important things to know if you meet those qualifications.

Three important requirements You can't claim spousal benefits if you are remarried. If, however, you remarried and then divorced again, you can claim spousal benefits from a divorced partner, as long as the marriage lasted at least 10 years.  You must be 62 or older to apply for spousal benefits. You must be entitled to a benefit less than your ex's work could qualify you for. How are Social Security benefits calculated? 

So how do you know whether your benefit would be less than the benefit you'd receive by claiming on your ex's work record? First you'll need to find your own benefit amount, which the SSA calculates based on two things: your work history and your earnings history.

To receive Social Security, folks need a work history in which they accrue a total of 40 lifetime work credits. A work credit is a metric based on income. Last year, for example, workers earned one lifetime work credit for every $1,320 they earned. That's going up this year: workers will earn one lifetime work credit for every $1,360 earned.

Even if someone brings home a cool million per year, though, they can't earn the entire 40 work credits needed in a year. In fact, four is the most anyone can receive in one year.

Once you qualify for the work credits, your earnings history kicks in to determine the amount you're entitled to. The SSA calculates benefits on the 35 highest-earning, inflation-adjusted years. If you've worked less than 35 years, $0 is averaged into the monthly payout calculations for each year under 35.

How are Social Security spousal benefits calculated?

Now, those calculations are for an individual receiving Social Security. A spousal benefit can be determined after computing both your work history and earnings history, as well as your ex's work history and earnings history.

If you qualify, the benefit for a divorced spouse is 50% of your ex's full retirement amount if you begin taking benefits at your FRA. So if your ex is eligible for $2,000 every month in Social Security benefits, you'd receive $1,000. If your ex delays retirement past their FRA, the concomitant increase in benefit amounts they'll get is not applied to your spousal benefit.

What if you're eligble under your own work and earnings history and your ex's? Do you have to select which one to claim on? No. The SSA will pay your own retirement benefit first and then it computes your potential benefit from your ex's work and earnings history. Once it has both, the SSA will adjust the benefit so you receive the higher amount.

People who are eligible for both, have hit their FRA, and have a birthday prior to January 2, 1954 have an important option to maximize their Social Security benefits too: You can decide to get just the benefit for divorced spouses and delay taking your own. That way you can receive the 8% yearly hike in your eventual benefit amount between your FRA and 70.

But if your birthday is January 2, 1954 or later, that choice has been phased out unfortunately. By filing for either retirement or spousal benefits, you'll be telling the SSA you want to file for all Social Security benefits for which you're eligible.

Sunday, February 17, 2019

Bel Fuse, Inc. (BELFB) Given Average Recommendation of “Buy” by Brokerages

Shares of Bel Fuse, Inc. (NASDAQ:BELFB) have received an average broker rating score of 2.00 (Buy) from the one brokers that provide coverage for the company, Zacks Investment Research reports. One research analyst has rated the stock with a buy recommendation.

Zacks has also given Bel Fuse an industry rank of 207 out of 255 based on the ratings given to its competitors.

Get Bel Fuse alerts:

BELFB has been the topic of several recent analyst reports. BidaskClub raised Bel Fuse from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Friday, January 18th. ValuEngine raised Bel Fuse from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Tuesday, November 6th.

NASDAQ:BELFB traded up $0.72 during trading hours on Friday, hitting $24.72. The company’s stock had a trading volume of 26,589 shares, compared to its average volume of 19,900. The firm has a market capitalization of $318.74 million, a PE ratio of 20.08 and a beta of 1.23. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.65, a current ratio of 2.89 and a quick ratio of 1.76. Bel Fuse has a 52-week low of $16.58 and a 52-week high of $29.00.

Hedge funds have recently modified their holdings of the business. Macquarie Group Ltd. grew its holdings in shares of Bel Fuse by 400.0% during the fourth quarter. Macquarie Group Ltd. now owns 2,000 shares of the electronics maker’s stock worth $37,000 after purchasing an additional 1,600 shares during the last quarter. Municipal Employees Retirement System of Michigan purchased a new position in shares of Bel Fuse during the fourth quarter worth about $51,000. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund purchased a new position in shares of Bel Fuse during the fourth quarter worth about $71,000. Acadian Asset Management LLC purchased a new position in shares of Bel Fuse during the third quarter worth about $113,000. Finally, ClariVest Asset Management LLC grew its holdings in shares of Bel Fuse by 53.9% during the fourth quarter. ClariVest Asset Management LLC now owns 8,751 shares of the electronics maker’s stock worth $161,000 after purchasing an additional 3,064 shares during the last quarter. 59.07% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors.

Bel Fuse Company Profile

Bel Fuse Inc designs, manufactures, markets, and sells products that are used in the networking, telecommunication, high-speed data transmission, commercial aerospace, military, broadcasting, transportation, and consumer electronic industries in North America, Asia, and Europe. It offers magnetic products, such as integrated connector modules; power transformers; SMD power inductors and SMPS transformers; and telecom discrete components.

Further Reading: What is the quiet period?

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Bel Fuse (BELFB)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Saturday, February 16, 2019

Snc-Lavalin Group (SNC) Price Target Lowered to C$44.00 at Royal Bank of Canada

Snc-Lavalin Group (TSE:SNC) had its price objective reduced by investment analysts at Royal Bank of Canada from C$48.00 to C$44.00 in a research note issued on Friday. Royal Bank of Canada’s target price would indicate a potential upside of 29.72% from the stock’s previous close.

Several other research firms have also recently commented on SNC. Canaccord Genuity reduced their target price on Snc-Lavalin Group from C$61.00 to C$58.00 in a research report on Wednesday, January 23rd. CIBC boosted their target price on Snc-Lavalin Group from C$52.00 to C$56.00 in a research report on Tuesday, January 15th. National Bank Financial reduced their target price on Snc-Lavalin Group from C$69.00 to C$66.00 and set an “outperform” rating for the company in a research report on Friday, November 2nd. BMO Capital Markets cut Snc-Lavalin Group from an “outperform” rating to a “market perform” rating and reduced their target price for the stock from C$60.00 to C$42.00 in a research report on Tuesday, January 29th. Finally, Raymond James cut Snc-Lavalin Group from an “outperform” rating to a “market perform” rating and reduced their target price for the stock from C$58.00 to C$45.00 in a research report on Tuesday, January 29th. Three equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and six have given a buy rating to the stock. The stock has an average rating of “Buy” and an average target price of C$48.78.

Get Snc-Lavalin Group alerts:

Snc-Lavalin Group stock traded up C$0.33 during midday trading on Friday, hitting C$33.92. 543,275 shares of the company’s stock were exchanged, compared to its average volume of 713,299. Snc-Lavalin Group has a 52-week low of C$33.30 and a 52-week high of C$61.54. The company has a quick ratio of 0.77, a current ratio of 0.89 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 72.88. The stock has a market cap of $5.97 billion and a price-to-earnings ratio of 17.94.

About Snc-Lavalin Group

SNC-Lavalin Group Inc provides consulting, design, engineering, construction, and operation and maintenance services worldwide. It operates through Mining & Metallurgy, Oil & Gas, Power, Infrastructure, Atkins, and Capital segments. The company offers various solutions for projects in the aluminum, gold, copper, iron ore, nickel, fertilizer, sulphur, and other projects.

Read More: What is insider trading?

Analyst Recommendations for Snc-Lavalin Group (TSE:SNC)

Thursday, February 14, 2019

Enerdynamic Hybrid Technologies (EHT) Trading Down 7.7%

Enerdynamic Hybrid Technologies Corp (CVE:EHT)’s share price was down 7.7% during trading on Monday . The stock traded as low as C$0.06 and last traded at C$0.06. Approximately 1,078,500 shares were traded during trading, a decline of 29% from the average daily volume of 1,508,979 shares. The stock had previously closed at C$0.07.

The firm has a market cap of $17.30 million and a P/E ratio of -1.03.

Get Enerdynamic Hybrid Technologies alerts:

TRADEMARK VIOLATION WARNING: “Enerdynamic Hybrid Technologies (EHT) Trading Down 7.7%” was published by Ticker Report and is the sole property of of Ticker Report. If you are accessing this article on another website, it was stolen and republished in violation of US and international trademark & copyright legislation. The correct version of this article can be read at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4147421/enerdynamic-hybrid-technologies-eht-trading-down-7-7.html.

About Enerdynamic Hybrid Technologies (CVE:EHT)

EnerDynamic Hybrid Technologies Corp. designs, develops, manufactures, assembles, and distributes structural building systems with integrated alternative energy technologies in Canada. The company offers fiberglass reinforced structural insulted panels; and solar panels, alternative energy producing carports, and alternative energy producing mobile trailers under the ENERTEC brand.

See Also: How to calculate the annual rate of depreciation

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Short Interest in Tivity Health Inc (TVTY) Rises By 45.8%

Tivity Health Inc (NASDAQ:TVTY) was the target of a large increase in short interest in January. As of January 31st, there was short interest totalling 6,712,457 shares, an increase of 45.8% from the January 15th total of 4,604,249 shares. Approximately 16.6% of the shares of the stock are short sold. Based on an average trading volume of 1,584,943 shares, the days-to-cover ratio is currently 4.2 days.

TVTY has been the topic of several recent analyst reports. Zacks Investment Research lowered shares of Tivity Health from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research note on Thursday, October 18th. BidaskClub raised shares of Tivity Health from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research note on Friday, October 19th. Cantor Fitzgerald reissued a “buy” rating and set a $49.00 target price on shares of Tivity Health in a research note on Monday, November 5th. ValuEngine raised shares of Tivity Health from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Tuesday, November 6th. Finally, Chardan Capital lowered their target price on shares of Tivity Health from $43.00 to $41.00 and set a “buy” rating on the stock in a research note on Tuesday, November 6th. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, one has given a hold rating and six have assigned a buy rating to the company’s stock. The stock currently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $40.86.

Get Tivity Health alerts:

TVTY opened at $21.14 on Tuesday. Tivity Health has a twelve month low of $21.00 and a twelve month high of $44.35. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.15, a current ratio of 0.98 and a quick ratio of 0.98. The stock has a market cap of $858.94 million, a P/E ratio of 12.58, a P/E/G ratio of 0.83 and a beta of 1.02.

Several institutional investors and hedge funds have recently added to or reduced their stakes in TVTY. Advisor Group Inc. raised its position in shares of Tivity Health by 364.2% during the 4th quarter. Advisor Group Inc. now owns 1,142 shares of the company’s stock worth $29,000 after purchasing an additional 896 shares during the last quarter. Enlightenment Research LLC acquired a new position in shares of Tivity Health during the 4th quarter worth about $37,000. First Quadrant L P CA acquired a new position in shares of Tivity Health during the 4th quarter worth about $65,000. NEXT Financial Group Inc acquired a new position in shares of Tivity Health during the 3rd quarter worth about $104,000. Finally, Acadian Asset Management LLC acquired a new position in shares of Tivity Health during the 4th quarter worth about $154,000.

ILLEGAL ACTIVITY NOTICE: This report was first published by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are accessing this report on another domain, it was illegally copied and republished in violation of US and international trademark & copyright legislation. The correct version of this report can be viewed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4144729/short-interest-in-tivity-health-inc-tvty-rises-by-45-8.html.

Tivity Health Company Profile

Tivity Health, Inc provides fitness and health improvement programs in the United States. The company offers SilverSneakers senior fitness program to the members of Medicare advantage, Medicare supplement, and group retiree plans; and Prime fitness, a fitness facility access program through commercial health plans and employers.

Featured Story: What does EPS mean?

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Cronos Group Is Slipping -- Buy on the Dip?

Cronos Group (NASDAQ:CRON) ranked as one of the top Canadian marijuana stocks of 2018. It was one of the hottest marijuana stocks last month. Even better, it stands as the best-performing marijuana stock of all time.

But Cronos is slipping. Its share price fell by a double-digit percentage during the first couple of weeks of February. Should investors consider buying this high-flying marijuana stock on the dip? Or are the good times possibly coming to an end for Cronos Group?

Marijuana leaf surrounded by four question marks

Image source: Getty Images.

Why Cronos slipped

Probably the biggest reason shares pulled back was an analyst's downgrade. GMP Securities analyst Martin Landry lowered his rating on Cronos from a buy to a hold on Feb. 5. 

Does Landry think that Cronos Group's management is making mistakes? Has Cronos Group's production capacity been impaired? Have the company's prospects at home in Canada or in international markets dimmed? No, no, and no.

GMP Securities downgraded Cronos Group simply because Landry thought that "shares need a breather." And his reduced rating helped ensure that the stock got that breather.

That's really all there is to the story. Cronos Group hasn't slipped due to anything pertaining to its business fundamentals. The pullback is a result of investors deciding that a stock that's enjoyed a huge run-up -- more than 170% over the last 12 months even with the recent slide -- is due for a pullback. I know that sounds like circular logic, but it's applicable logic in this case.

Why it could fall even more

However, just because there are no fundamental reasons for concern about Cronos Group now doesn't mean that there won't be any in the future. Things can change quickly.

It's important to remember that its market cap has soared to more than $3.5 billion on minimal sales. In its last reported quarter, the company made only 3.8 million in Canadian dollars (less than $3 million). Pretty much all of Cronos Group's valuation hinges on expectations of tremendous growth.

There are lots of ways those expectations might not be met. Cronos might not be able to increase its production capacity as quickly as needed to meet demand, and lose to other companies that are able to do so. It's possible that global demand for marijuana won't grow as much as expected. Countries that have recently legalized medical marijuana could take longer than anticipated to build viable markets. Countries that many hope will allow legal marijuana (primarily the U.S.) might not do so anytime soon.

Even if the fundamental picture for Cronos Group doesn't deteriorate, there's no way to know for sure how long its current breather might last. If the company's next quarterly update isn't overly impressive and there are no other positive catalysts, Cronos stock could potentially languish for months.   

The big picture

Now that I've painted the picture for what could happen with Cronos, let me explain what I think is most likely to happen.

First, I fully expect the company will report sizzling sales growth in its next quarter. This will be the first quarter to include revenue from the recreational marijuana market in Canada. I think it's likely that Cronos will enjoy a bump from its next quarterly update in a few weeks, ending the pullback if it hasn't already ended before then.

I also think that the Canadian government will meet its goal of opening the legal market for cannabis edibles, beverages, and concentrates used in vaping in October 2019. This new market should provide another boost for Canadian marijuana stocks, including Cronos.

My take is that Cronos Group will begin to reap the rewards from its partnership with tobacco giant Altria later this year. This relationship is more important than just the money that Cronos will receive, although that's not an insignificant factor.

Altria CEO Howard Willard said a few weeks ago that "there are opportunities really across the world in a variety of product categories, both recreational and medicinal, that would involve [Cronos] entering new product forms and developing new products and new product brands." His words underscore that there's a much bigger opportunity before Cronos than what we've seen in the past or even what we'll see in much of 2019. 

I think the big picture for Cronos Group continues to look very good. The current breather is probably nothing more than a breather for this high-flying stock. Buy Cronos on the dip? In my view, that sounds like a pretty good move for aggressive investors.

Monday, February 11, 2019

World Wrestling Entertainment Inc (WWE) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

World Wrestling Entertainment Inc  (NYSE:WWE)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 07, 2019, 11:00 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Hello and welcome to the webcast entitled WWE Fourth Quarter Earnings. We have just a few announcements before we begin. First, please use the question mark icon in the upper right hand corner of your web console for technical assistance. The option to enlarge slides is located in the right on your slides with the arrows pointing in different direction. You may ask your question at any time by typing your question into the question box located on the web interface and clicking send. (Operator Instructions)

I will now turn the call over to Michael Weitz, SVP Financial Planning and Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Michael Weitz -- Senior Vice President Financial Planning and Investor Relations

Thank you, Amanda, and good morning everyone. Welcome to WWE's fourth quarter 2018 earnings call. Leading today's discussion are Vince McMahon, our Chairman and CEO; as well as George Barrios and Michelle Wilson, our Co-Presidents. Their remarks will be followed by a Q&A session. We issued two releases earlier this morning, one pertaining to our 2018 earnings and the second announcing a share repurchase program. These releases, our earnings presentation, other supporting materials have been posted on our website, corporate.wwe.com/investors.

Today's discussion will include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views are based on various assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties disclosed in our SEC filings. Actual results may differ materially and undue reliance should not be placed on them.

Additionally, the matters we will be discussing today may include non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP information is set forth in our earnings release and presentation, which are available on our website. Finally, as a reminder, today's call is being recorded and the replay will be available on our website later today.

At this time, it's my privilege to turn the call over to Vince.

Vincent K. McMahon -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, everyone. For the year, we achieved record revenue and profit as well demonstrating we continue to effectively execute our strategy. In other words, we know what we're doing.

Our international revenue surpassed $300 million for the first time in the history and of course always been one of our goals to achieve more international revenue we're getting there. Just a reminder, we completed our agreements with Fox in USA to provide much more powerful platform for broadening our audience and driving growth. It's not just that, it's also the promotion behind it, which we think will be exponential with both parties, which is going to help us, not just in terms of television, that's overall exposure. As you know everything else come behind that in terms of CPG, et cetera, et cetera.

Of course, we performed large-scale record breaking events; Greatest Royal Rumble, WWE Super Show-Down, which is in Australia, and actually it was like as the largest attendees we had for an event overseas in the past 25 years. It grew our WWE network with 8%, an increase in average paid subs to 1.65 million. We are focused on other deepening engagement in terms of production of content Miz & Mrs., which is a hit television series, featuring the Miz and his Wife, Michelle. And we delivered eight season, pretty much it is remarkable in eight season of a Total Divas, and the third season with Total Bellas. In addition to that, we also produced Evolution, which is an all-women's pay-per-view did quite well for us. And we have Mixed Match Challenge in which we did a second season on Facebook Watch. Generally speaking we're pleased with our performance. And we continue to transform WWE. And hopefully, we have another year of record breaking results. George?

George Barrios -- Co-President

Thanks, Vince. There are several key topics, which Michelle and I would like to review today, includes management discussion of our financial performance, the progress of key strategic initiatives and our business outlook.

As Vince said in 2018, we effectively executed our strategy to leverage our brand, increased the monetization of our content worldwide across multiple platforms. We generated record revenues for the fifth year in a row of $930 million. The international markets surpassing $300 million for the first time in our history. These results reflected higher content rights fees, increased advertising and sponsorship sales and the continued growth of our direct-to-consumer WWE Network. We achieved adjusted OIBDA, nearly $179 million, which is also a record that exceeded the high end of our guidance primarily due to some cost savings and timing of certain initiatives to shift that from the fourth quarter into the current year.

During the fourth quarter, our strong results reflected our ability to create captivating new content, brought new audience and drive performance based on economies of scale. In the period, we produced several spectacular large scale events such as Crown Jewel and Super Show-Down that had a meaningful impact on our results, as evident in our Media and Live Event segments. And accounted for a substantial share of our overall $23 million growth in adjusted OIBDA.

To review our business performance in the quarter, let's turn to Page five of the presentation, which shows revenue, operating income and adjusted OIBDA by segment as compared to the prior year.

Michelle D. Wilson -- Co-President

Looking at our Media segment, adjusted OIBDA increased $22.8 million based on the 40%, or a $58.9 million increase in revenue. Revenue growth was driven by the distribution of new content in international markets as George referenced and higher rights fees in core content agreements. The significant monetization of new content was -- in the core component of the quarter's other media and advertising revenue. Additionally, WWE Network added to the growth as the average paid subscribers increased 7% to nearly 1.6 million and contributed to subscriber growth of 8% for the full year.

The increased monetization of content reflected some important operational achievements. We produce approximately 425 hours of content, work to optimize our future distribution and capitalize on new opportunities to expand our audience across platforms. Extending our reach on television, we completed our eight successful season as Total Divas, as Vince mentioned with the ninth season plan for 2019. We also announced new seasons of both Total Bellas and Miz & Mrs., which is both rapidly gained a very loyal audience.

Our streaming service WWE network, we expanded live in-ring content and original programming, which continued to drive viewer engagement. Among the network's most viewed programs during the quarter were international pay-per-view events, Super Show-Down and Crown Jewel. Our first all-in pay-per-view event evolution, as well as the newly launched weekly series, NXT UK.

On social and digital platforms, consumption of WWE content continued to increase dramatically. Over the year, digital video views increased 57% to 31.4 billion. And fans watch more than 1.2 billion hours of content on those platforms. That represents a 77% increase from last year.

Contributing to this growth, we produced approximately 165 hours of social and digital content, including the second season of Mixed Match Challenge on Facebook Watch.

In 2018, in total, we produced more than 1,600 hours of original content across platform, which generated consumption in the range of 6 billion hours. Over the year, we work to diversify our talent based and established our first performance center outside of the United States. Looking ahead, we expect to increase our production capabilities and deliver even more localized content for our international markets. We believe this will further engage and grow our global audience.

Turning back to our segment performance, adjusted OIBDA from consumer products increased from the prior year quarter, primarily due to a new FASB standard for revenue recognition. The adoption of that standard increased licensing revenue in the period by approximately $8 million. Excluding the impact of this change, adjusted OIBDA from the consumer products declined from the fourth quarter last year primarily due to lower sales of merchandise at our e-commerce site WWE Shop, and lower royalties from the sale of our toy products. Despite that result, we remain the number one action figure in the United States and the latest releases of our franchise video games, WWE 2K19 earned its highest Metacritic score since 2K began producing our game back in 2013.

During the quarter, we also continued to increase the penetration of our mobile game. At year-end, we had more than 100 million installed across our mobile game portfolio, which was led by WWE Champions and WWE Supercard. Also included our newest game WWE Mayhem. Lastly, following the successful launch of WWE Custom Tees, a new component of WWE Shop, which we described last quarter, we are now planning to extend the service to our international markets and we believe it will drive 2019 growth in e-commerce.

George Barrios -- Co-President

Going on Page eight of the presentation, revenue from Live Events, reflected the impact of holding several large scale international shows. WWE Super Show-Down featured the most extensive roster of WWE Superstars that ever appear in Australia, became the highest-attended event outside the US in the past 25 years, attracting more than 70,000 fans. Growth however was offset by the timing and performance of other events worldwide. Specifically, we staged 14 fewer events in the quarter, in part to accommodate these special events. Additionally, average attendance at our North American event declined 7% to approximately 5,000. Regarding our Live Events, I thought it would be helpful to provide broader context on our North American business.

Turning to Page nine of the presentation, I'd like to focus on three key points. First, over the past decade, total annual attendance at our North American events and revenues from ticket sales of those events as followed steadily increasing trend line. Second, of the 310 main roster Raw and SmackDown events in 2018, only a 113 of those were events where we created video content and monetize that media to content rights fees, first part of our WWE Network subscription service. And finally for those 113 events where we created and monetize video content, our quote-unquote TV and pay-per-view event, average attendance has generally been growing are stable.

Turning back to our overall results. The significant adjusted OIBDA growth in our Media segment in a one-time $11.3 million prior year charge with the adoption of the new tax act were the primary drivers of growth in net income. Additionally, fourth quarter net income benefited from $2.5 million unrealized gain due to mark-to-market adjustment of a marketable equity investment. You should note, that as the underlying market value of this investment fluctuates, WWE is exposed to future earnings volatility to the extent we continue to hold this investment.

Page 10 of our presentation shows selected elements of our capital structure. As of December 31st, 2018, WWE held approximately $360 million in cash and short-term investments. Additionally, we estimate approximately $100 million in debt capacity under the company's revolving credit facility. In 2018, we generated approximately $154 million in free cash flow, as compared to $72 million in the prior year, growth driven by improved operating performance. Partially offsetting this increase in free cash flow, we paid $51 million of payroll taxes associated with annual vesting of our equity awards. The scale of this amount, reflected as a financing activity in our cash flow statement, was due to the significant increase in our stock price.

In terms of our capital structure, we are committed to maintaining a strong balance sheet, providing adequate liquidity for deepening our global brand wealth through investments. As we look to the future, we believe that WWE will generate significant cash flow that enables us to pursue these objectives and return excess capital to shareholders. This morning, we announced that our Board of Directors has authorized a stock repurchase plan of up to $500 million. The authorization of a stock repurchase program underscores our commitment to the company's shareholders. The decision was supported by WWE strong financial performance demonstrates our confidence in the company's future.

The objectives of our capital deployment strategy are to maintain significant financial flexibility, provide adequate liquidity for investing in growth opportunities, and to return excess capital to shareholders. We plan to repurchase stock opportunistically, when the price is below WWE's intrinsic value as conservatively estimated by management, and the returns of share repurchases compared favorably to other capital allocation alternatives. In our view, we should keep this on the right path or continuing to build shareholder value.

Turning to our outlook. In 2019, we expect to achieve another year of record revenue of approximately $1 billion, previously committed, we are targeting adjusted OIBDA of at least $200 million, which would also be an all-time record. We believe in increasing the engagement of our fans over the next few years will enhance WWE's brands nearby strengthening our ability to optimize the value of our content. Given what we believe the potential magnitude of this opportunity is, and its importance to our long-term growth, we will continue to invest in content, digitization and deepening our global footprint. The areas of investment for 2019 will include our talent, developing a wider range of content, including localized content, developing the next iteration of WWE Network, and leveraging data to improve all areas of our business. In 2019, as we have in the past, we will continue to balance current earnings growth with investments that strengthen engagement and drive long-term value.

To note that net income in 2019 could be impacted by changes in the value of the marketable equity investments, I mentioned. Additionally, we anticipate an effective tax rate of approximately 25% before factoring in the impact of any discrete items, including the impact of the recent share appreciation on the vesting of share-based compensation.

We've previously discussed the step up in capital expenditures that build out our content production infrastructure. That spending was delayed in 2018, as our workplace strategy continued to evolve. Total capital expenditures are now estimated at $70 million to $90 million for 2019 with continued spending in 2020 above the historic range of approximately 4% to 7% of revenue. And we'll provide further guidance when the related client and timeline have been finalized.

For the first quarter of 2019, we estimate adjusted OIBDA of $9 million to $14 million. This range as well as expected performance through third quarter represent a year-over-year decline at higher rights fees were offset by increases in fixed costs, including the timing of strategic investments. Achieving our targeted full year 2019 results assumed the substantial revenue increase which should generate adjusted OIBDA of at least $100 million in the fourth quarter. Importantly, our new distribution agreements in the US, which become effective in the fourth quarter give us significant visibility into that expectation and into the strong year-over-year growth that we anticipate in every quarter of 2020.

Additionally we're projecting average paid subscribers to WWE Network of approximately 1.5 million for the first quarter. As you know, since the launch of WWE Network, we've issued a release and held a conference call to report network sublevels following WrestleMania. Given the success of WWE Network, we no longer believes such a call provides useful information to investors. Based on these factors and frankly extremely short time period between WrestleMania and our first quarter earnings call, we don't plan on issuing a release or hosting a call, the day after WrestleMania.

In conclusion, in 2019, we'll continue to focus on determining our distribution strategy in various international markets. And we expect to complete this work and provide additional perspective on our plans toward the first -- end of the first half of 2019. We'll also continue to work on developing the next iteration of WWE Network, creating new content, localized content and continuing with leverage data and new digital products. We believe these strategic initiatives will further engage (Technical Difficulty) deepen the mode around our business. Our execution in the context of the ongoing media industry trends will create the foundation for sustainable long-term growth and increases in shareholder value.

That concludes this portion of the call. And I'll now turn it back to Michael.

Michael Weitz -- Senior Vice President Financial Planning and Investor Relations

Amanda, please open the lines for questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Okay. (Operator Instructions) We will take our first question from Ben Swinburne with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Benjamin Swinburne -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Thank you. Good morning, everybody. Couple of questions, George. Could you talk a little bit about the investments you're making in 2019. Any help in quantifying sort of the incremental spending that you're highlighting in the press release that you would call strategic. And should we expect that to be fairly linear through the year. Since you guys obviously have a very back-end loaded EBITDA expectation. And then secondly, I guess, I have to ask since I'm the first on the call, any update on the UK process, which is now has gone beyond your at least initial suggested timeline for us to expect a result about?

George A. Barrios -- Co-President & Director

Yeah. So, Ben, on the first part on the investments, think about it this way. If you look at our core fixed cost base in 2018, kind of where we started the year that tends to grow 3% to 4% annually. You kind of apply that, a little bit higher rate on compensation, which is frankly the biggest chunk of our cost back. Throughout the year -- and it gets to the timing questions, which I'll get to, but toward the end of the year, third quarter, and then into the fourth quarter, we began ramping up some of those strategic investments. So I'll talk a little bit about what they are, but that's when they started to get the full-year impact in 2019. So the comp -- the compares in Q1, which I talked about the decline in OIBDA, and then they soften a little bit in Q2, little bit more in Q3, and then by Q4, the year-over-year comps actually even out. So you don't have the investment impact at this point. I'll say, as we go through the year, as you know, we have a forecast, we started the year with, it gets updated just about daily. So, we will tune any further investments depending on what we see. So, if we're moving revenue at a faster clip than we anticipate, we may put some additional investments in the fourth quarter, but all geared toward hitting that $200 million in OIBDA for the year.

And as we talked about on the prepared remarks, it really is on those areas of continuing to drive content, especially the localization of our current content and essentially the local content in some of our key international markets. We just think that's a big addition to the fly wheel that we built. We'll continue to invest in digital products and digitization kind of with large -- the network being kind of one of the largest manifestations of that. And we'll continue to put more people -- more kind of functional roles in our key markets in India and the Middle East, in China and Latin America. So that's what we're going to do. As we said again in the prepared remarks, we think there's a long tale for us in the monetization of content, both in the US and outside the US, and we think the opportunities, we'll make sure, we'll take advantage of.

In terms of the rights renewal process outside the US, obviously there's a lot of key markets that we're still working on, UK, India, China, Latin America, the Middle East. We'll announce those as the deals get done or shortly thereafter. We will not update the economics on any single region, what we will do is, update the total core content licensing revenue that we expect. So we can see what the outcome is in total for the portfolio, but no individual market. As opposed to the announcement around the UK, you rightly mentioned back in 2017, we have said, we thought, we did complete the UK agreement toward the back half of 2018. It hasn't happened. So, I think it's fair to say that all the agreements will be completed substantively by the middle of the year. And so we'll announce those as they get done. We're not going to put a specific date on any one agreement at this point.

Benjamin Swinburne -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Thank you very much.

George Barrios -- Co-President

Okay.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Curry Baker with Guggenheim Securities.

Curry Baker -- Guggenheim Securities -- Analyst

Hey, thanks for the question. I want on content. The second season of Mixed Match Challenge wrapped up in December. Can you provide us any update on the metrics you've gotten from having two seasons on the Facebook Watch platform. And then there has not been a renewal for the third season. So how are you thinking about the incremental content deals going forward? Does a fixed hours of content each week makes sense? And if so, where you in the process of maybe rolling out a third hour of SmackDown or anything like that?

Michelle D. Wilson -- Co-President

So, Curry, hi. It's Michelle. See on Facebook, as I mentioned on the last call, I think it's both pieces of Mixed Match Challenge have been a great learning experience for WWE on our side, around driving viewership on the Facebook Watch platform. Again the metrics are the same that we follow all of our content, which is times viewed. So again, we were pleased with what we've learned and we've learned a lot about how to produce short-form content for Facebook. They work with us very closely in terms of how to drive our fans from our large footprint in Facebook around our talent and the WWE pages to the Watch tab. So again, I think, it was a great experiment for us and we've learned a lot. So again, I'll let George to comment on kind of the six hour and what our plans are for that, but that's pretty much it on Facebook.

George A. Barrios -- Co-President & Director

Yeah, Curry, and the second part of the question, just to give content, because I know you notice, but for everyone on the call. So for a long time, we've created six hours of Live Event in-ring content on Mondays and Tuesdays. Two hours of Raw, two hours of SmackDown and previously ECW, NXT main event Superstars. Obviously a few years ago, we moved to three hours for Raw and two hours for SmackDown. That six hour, if you will as you referred to it continued to be things like Mondays Main Event. This past year it was 205 live and WWE Network, it was Mixed Match Challenge, which Michelle just spoke about. So, yeah, we need to look at that obviously the Live Event content is valuable and like every piece of content, whether is Miz & Maryse or Raw or SmackDown or NXT, we have to think about what's the best platform for that content. Is it on a Reebok (ph) platform, is it in the pay-TV bundle, is in our direct-to-consumer. So we're doing that evaluation now. And once we've finalized that decision will let everyone know.

Curry Baker -- Guggenheim Securities -- Analyst

Okay, thanks guys.

Operator

We'll take our next question from David Karnovsky with JPMorgan.

David Karnovsky -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. For both your revenue and OIBDA guide in 2019, does that currently include any large international events like Saudi Arabia, WWE Super Showdown. And then just to clarify, are you expecting or it declines in each of the first three quarters, or just over that period in total?

George Barrios -- Co-President

Yes, on the first one, as you know, we announced a 10-year deals into a major event in the Middle East. So that's in there. I'm not going to comment on any other events that are kind of in our forecast. We don't get into that level of granular detail. And with regards to Ben's question, your second part David is the investment element in the timing of that is most pronounced in the first quarter, a little bit less in the second quarter, but probably decline there as well. And then similarly by the third quarter it begins to abate somewhat, but potentially kind of flat to down in the third quarter as well. And then the fourth quarter will be a significant increase, as the US rights deal comes into play. And at this point, we're expecting at least $100 million of adjusted OIBDA in that quarter.

David Karnovsky -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Okay. And then you've mentioned investing in your talent base in 2019, and we've seen in the recent months in your wrestling promotion announce. Just wondering how this is potentially impacting the market for talent and whether you're exceeding more cost inflation there than normal? Thanks.

George Barrios -- Co-President

Yeah, too early to talk. Everybody talk about the specifics of that. From our perspective, we think, we are the premier global organization and greatest wrestlers in the world. Want to be in the bridge platform. So we have a lot of confidence and ability to manage that.

David Karnovsky -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Okay, thanks.

George Barrios -- Co-President

Okay.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Brandon Ross with BTIG.

Brandon Ross -- BTIG -- Analyst

Hi, thanks for taking the questions. You have content deals in progress that I believe will impact 2019, including China and Mexico, I think. How are these embedded in your 2019 guide? And what progress has been made there? And then on the China market, what specifically are you seeing there? How is your progress and popularity changed since the last TV deal that you got there? Thanks.

George Barrios -- Co-President

Sure. So, yes, you're right, there's some deals are expired during the year. So the outcome of those will impact 2019. As far as, what's embedded in the guide is our best estimates of where those deals will turn out. Obviously, in some, we have better visibility than others. So because of the timing of the discussions. But in all, we have some level of visibility at this point. So the conversations continue. They're frankly, not that a similar market-by-market, little bit kind of where you are in the conversation might differ, just because of the timing, but otherwise everything continues a pace and a lot of pieces and so on in everyone's passport. So which is a good thing. And then Michelle can touch on.

Michelle D. Wilson -- Co-President

On China, as a reminder to everyone, our content is distributed there on it with a digital-first strategy with PP Sport. And again, we've seen our consumption of both Raw and SmackDown, and again what's great about that partnership we are delivering Raw and SmackDown live in Mandarin, and so that is obviously been great to driving our viewership and our families in that market. So consumption on Raw and SmackDown continues to grow well in that market. We are pleased with the growth. Again what's nice about digital and social, as you can grow that pretty quickly. As most of you know, we had a strategy where we put some social media, content producers on the ground in that market, that's also grow in our social media footprint significantly. As George mentioned, we are one of our primary focus is putting investments into the market and China is one of them where we can do more localized content that means highlights and clips and how we tell the story Raw and SmackDown a social platforms being in Mandarin. And right now, we are just scratching the surface of that. We believe long-term that will continue to grow our families in China. So again, we're happy with the growth and we expected to continue as we engage our fans deeper with localized content.

Brandon Ross -- BTIG -- Analyst

Thank you.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Eric Handler with MKM Partners.

Eric Handler -- MKM Partners -- Analyst

Thank you very much, and good morning. Two questions for you. First, George a bit of a modeling question. When you look at these investments, particularly what we're going to see in the first quarter, is that going to impact more the Media division line? Is that going to impact more on the corporate line, where we're going to see these investments show up?

George Barrios -- Co-President

Yeah, you'll see more on the media side, as well as -- as you know, we allocate some of the -- our cost as well. Back to the segments, the cost that we feel appropriately belong in the segments, because they're closer to the end customer. So some of those costs as well. But yeah, primarily, just because of the scale of the media business, so they're (ph) predominantly there.

Eric Handler -- MKM Partners -- Analyst

Okay. And then a question for Paul, if he is there, if he is not, whoever chooses. The other day, thanks to the magical power of the Internet there was picture of Paul, making a presentation and behind him was a map of the world and forward-looking, thinking about where future performance centers can go and we had one in Latin America and Asia and five different places, I think it was. How close are we to? I know, you just opened up the UK center. But as you think about more localization of product how close are we to actually seeing these performance centers start getting opened in various other regions?

George Barrios -- Co-President

Yeah. And I think to give in a little bit broader context, Vince in the discussion the other day said something, I thought was really impactful. And that is it -- in the next five years to 10 years, our ability to develop local content could be as valuable as the western content that we today export Raw and SmackDown. So, when we talk about this performance and the center strategy, gambling strategy globally. It has multiple points: it has -- number one, it gives us a greater pipeline of talent; number two, it allows us in the short-term to monetize; and then number three, get to that longer-term vision, that Vince mentioned. So for us, the question is, how? How and when? And you saw the UK was, I would describe on kind of on a light scale, if Orlando is on the heavy scale, replicating that UK's more on the light scale, and that's the beginning. So we'll see over time, because we're going to learn. I think that's one of the thing culturally the organization does really well. It starts off small, it learns, it grows quicker and quicker and quicker. Before you know it, you've got this huge overnight success. So that will be the approach we take with the PC model. I saw that picture Paul too, he looked (inaudible) on that.

Eric Handler -- MKM Partners -- Analyst

And then just one last follow-up, if I could. With the share buyback, I'm just curious what drove your decision to do a buyback rather than, let's say, increase the dividend at this time.

George Barrios -- Co-President

Yeah. So, obviously, the first question was, what do we see in terms of free cash flow. We have today a lot of confidence in that over the next several years. And then we evaluated a variety of models. And we just thought that the ability to balance to maintain the strength of the balance sheet and given us the flexibility around that, reacting the new assumptions that will have both about external environment, our own internal operations. We just thought authorizing a buyback program just gave us a lot more flexibility.

Eric Handler -- MKM Partners -- Analyst

Great. Thank you.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Vasily Karasyov with Cannonball Research.

Vasily Karasyov -- Cannonball Research -- Analyst

Thank you. Good morning. I have a couple. George, you just mentioned your confidence in free cash flow generation. I think this year your EBITDA to free cash flow conversion was around 90%, and that's up from 53% last year. Can you tell us what kind of level we should expect now in the next three years? What's the right kind of assumption? And then I have a question on advertising and sponsorship.

George A. Barrios -- Co-President & Director

Yeah, I'm going to stay away from your question on free cash flow conversion. I think there are some things we need to lock down before we can comment on that, we do want to get the international renewals completed. We want to have a little bit more visibility on our workplace strategy, the timing of that, we'll stay away from that. I also will say, we have -- when you look at our cash flow annually, there are timing elements around that, I tend to myself, look at it two year or three-year average, especially the working capital changes. But I'm not going to peg a specific conversion number at this point for the reasons I mentioned.

Vasily Karasyov -- Cannonball Research -- Analyst

Okay. The second question is about advertising and sponsorship revenue accelerating in Q4 and for the full year in the Media segment. So my question is, a) should we expect this lumpiness in terms of growth rates in 2019 to continue? And then would it be fair to assume that the incremental margin for this revenue stream as close to like 85%, 90%? Thank you.

George A. Barrios -- Co-President & Director

There are two things. It's lumpy by the nature. So we're not going to get into quarter-over-quarter guide. And then on the margin, it depends on a lot of instance, our digital assets are part of that. And within that, specifically our relationship with YouTube. And so the way we record the revenue and attendant COGS, depends on whether it's sold by us or sold by them. So I don't want to get into all mechanics of that. I think it's fair to say it's very, very profitable revenue, 80%, 90%. So, I wouldn't say it's at that level, again because of this mix issue.

Vasily Karasyov -- Cannonball Research -- Analyst

Thank you.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Eric Katz with Wolfe Research.

Eric Katz -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Thanks, good morning all. Nice to see a stock up in this tape. So well done. You've been able to find a number of incremental opportunities over the last few years whether Saudi Arabia, Facebook, or in your TV shows. Is there anything you can tell us about potentially new opportunities or areas of interest you're looking into for 2019 and beyond. And sort of in that vein? Any thoughts of putting some NXT content on Fox?

George A. Barrios -- Co-President & Director

Yeah. So on the first part, I think, Vince mentioned on the last call, again it gets to the culture of the company has kind of continuous reimagination of itself. And we have a pretty robust process, Eric of evaluating both organic and inorganic opportunities. It's just reading what Michelle earlier this morning. So yeah, there is a lot on the pipeline. We're not going to talk about what those are. But I will say it's really rigorous. We've got a real focus on return profile. On some cases, that return is over multiple years, because our ability to monetize content for example might be driven by contractual agreement. But I will say it's a really rigorous process around what the return threshold is on the investments. You had another one?

Eric Handler -- MKM Partners -- Analyst

With regard to potentially playing NXT on Fox?

George A. Barrios -- Co-President & Director

Right. Yeah, it look, I think we've talked about it a little bit earlier. The main thing, and it's -- there's two big changes that it really happened over the last 10 years. Number one, WWE has become predominantly a Media company. Over 70% of its revenue in 2018 was from media. As opposed to from tickets or products. So that's a fundamental shift in the last 10 years. And that percentage will probably grow, as we hit the fourth quarter of this year. And then (inaudible) the business model is almost inverted. The second thing along with that is the monetization of the media now comes across multiple platforms. 10 years ago, what was being monetized was really one choice, and usually you're with a limited partner set. Today we have multiple platforms, some of which we control ourselves. The question we have for everything, including NXT is, what is the best way for that content? And you take the prism of our fans -- where are our fans consuming. What piece of content and tailored to which part of our fan group, because everyone has different appetite for different thing. And then obviously monetization, both direct monetization and indirect, the promotional element. So all of that goes into the -- those are the prisms we look at. And so NXT is no different. We have the same discussions. And sometimes, there's constructive debate internally around that because it's not an easy call. So that's a long way to (Multiple Speakers).

Eric Handler -- MKM Partners -- Analyst

Yeah, just you're starting that, do you know what the awareness is, of NXT content beyond those who are on the network?

George A. Barrios -- Co-President & Director

Yeah, look, if you think about the building of that brand and the second most -- if you think, WWE Network is a bundle of contents, you're always thinking about what the incremental value of any unit in a bundle. It's the second -- in our view it's the second most valuable unit in our bundle behind the pay-per-view. So it has significant value there for us. And if you look at -- when we do a takeover it's trending globally, right.

Michelle D. Wilson -- Co-President

And we just did, and for those of you who were watching the Super Bowl and following social media simultaneously, there's a interest of NXT is significant on social media following. So, we -- Paul and his team did have time, which was brought back from 20 years ago, which took place in NXT match during the half time Super Bowl and it trended worldwide and Veedol (ph) allowed the top advertisers trending and at the same time. So, when you talk about awareness, when you can drive global trends during the Super Bowl around NXT as a brand, I think that speaks volumes to the awareness of that brand. So again, those social metrics tend to be a very good indicator around awareness. And again trending worldwide is not an easy thing to accomplish on Super Bowl Sunday.

Eric Handler -- MKM Partners -- Analyst

Certainly better than the Halftime Show. Thanks guys.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Laura Martin with Needham.

Laura Martin -- Needham -- Analyst

Hi, there. I'd love to see, if we can get since (inaudible). So Vince, you got a stable SVOD environment for the last couple of years where you guys have grown the WWE Network. And now in this year we're going to get AT&T, Disney, NBC, lots of SVOD new entrants, as well as a lot of a AVOD (ph) new entrants. And I'm interested in your point of view about how many SVOD services do you think the average household is going to take and whether you think these new competitors, big competitors with a lot of marketing dollars and three avails sitting behind them are going to affect the OTT growth and you're viewing in general (ph)?

Vincent K. McMahon -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Well, first of all, there is nothing in a world like WWE, whether it's Disney they have, what their platforms, and well, that works for you, if all of those works. But nonetheless you know this is -- it's not really a niche type situation, but it's a very unique form of -- you can't get it anywhere else. All right. And that's you know really a tremendous advantage that we have over everything else. And again, the nimble nature of what we can do as an extension of all of this. So we can fit in, into a bundle, we can fit into just our network, there's so many ramifications on those -- that we can be a part of a number of things, we can be a separate, combination of all the above. I think that we fit in very well, in terms of who we are, and then the unique nature of our product and the demand for it. So, I think it's a plus, not in terms of being. Ireland, Ireland is a good industry in this respect.

Laura Martin -- Needham -- Analyst

Okay.

Michelle D. Wilson -- Co-President

Laura, the other thing I would add to that, we've had a lot of discussions around each of those streaming services. And you know, we were absent in 2014, and I think our value proposition has continued to be very strong. We survey our subscribers regularly, and we constantly hear the value that we deliver in the content that we're putting out. As George mentioned, on the next iteration of WWE Network, if we're doing for that a reason and making that investment to ensure that we continue to deliver a great product, the best user experience and great content. So we feel good about our streaming service relative to the other choices that consumers have.

Laura Martin -- Needham -- Analyst

Okay. Ronda Rousey again, Vince, I don't know, if you're willing to -- this is well, maybe controversial for you. But Ronda Rousey was an experiment. She built her brand on a different platform. She brought it with her to WWE. I see that you put the Evolution ad, which is awesome on the financial outlook page, which is the Wall Street key page. And I'm just wondering, if she leaves, under this hypothetical question, let's say Ronda Rousey leaves the WWE, does that damage the WWE franchise? And does that make the experiment a worthy experiment to bring in people from that has built around elsewhere in the WWE will they remain in fact and exit and hurt the WWE brand? I'm curious as to that experiment you're learnings from this Ronda Rousey experiment?

Vincent K. McMahon -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Will, again, we can bring people from the outside into our agreement, it can be just a one-off type thing because then our audience realizes that's not going to -- we're seeing the (inaudible) as far as their enjoyment of what we do. But nonetheless bringing Ronda then gave us more visibility in terms of the initiative of reaching more women. And when you do something like that, it allows you to not just use Ronda's platform from a different nature to come into WWE. Ronda ourself becomes a brand of WWE. She's a different Ronada, than what you saw before in terms of UFC and things of that nature. So -- and when you put talent, rogue talent, so to speak up against Ronda, Ronda can help us make talent. And she is doing just that. And she knows how to do it, she is one of the brightest people we've ever done business with. And the fact that she is adapted to the WWE culture so fast, it really is truly an amazing salute to her as an athlete and as a human being. So the Rondas will come in and out and when they do, as long as we know what those dates are, you plan around it. The unfortunate aspect of sometimes in our business is that we -- our performers are not cartoons, they get hurt. And this year leading up to where we are now we're at a number of injuries. And when you have injuries and I mean, there's a bunch of the Roman Reigns being a principal among them. And even John Cena, not an injury type thing. We thought we're going to have John more over part of our programming than we do, John got blessing, he's making more movies. And even John I would think would say jeez, I thought, I was going to spend more time with what I love to do, which is WWE. It's the only thing coming in and out. So it's not really part of our storyline. So you lose John, you lose Roman Reigns. In addition to that, we've got injuries Sasha Banks, Becky Lynch, one of our top female performers. Kevin Owens is a champions name, Bray Wyatt, Charlotte Flair, Alexa Bliss, Braun Strowman, Dean Ambrose and (inaudble) from our new tag team Jason Jordan, Fandango, Big Show, Seth Rollins. We had all these injuries, which is really unusual for us. And their characters you know, if you're writing a soap opera and all of a sudden your main character wasn't there in the middle of production, what do you do? Well, you very nimbly change the storyline. But it's not as good as the original one, sometimes it's better, because we're pretty good at it. But those are things that we're faced with, one of the reasons why television ratings have dropped. And one of the reasons, obviously from a lighter than standpoint, that's dropped too, because you don't have your favorites on television. Obviously we can't see them in a lighter than. So we're wide open, Ronda has done an extraordinary job. There will be other individuals coming from different areas that will join us on a long-term basis. It will help us as well. Hope that answers.

Laura Martin -- Needham -- Analyst

And that answers my third question too, which was about the attendance drop it sounds like some of these injuries occurred the storylines in the content. So that it's not secular you think next year if everybody's healthy, it sounds like you think attendance might kick back up again.

Vincent K. McMahon -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Great.

Laura Martin -- Needham -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks very much. Very helpful. Thank you.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) We will take our next question from Evan Wingren with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Evan Wingren -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Thanks. Just a quick one on subs. The growth that you're guiding to for the first quarter implies a bit of a deceleration. Is that something that you're seeing in the numbers from Royal Rumble and just sort of wondering. Can you give a bit of color on kind of what you're seeing in terms of gross adds and churns at a high level kind of inter-quarter? Thanks.

George Barrios -- Co-President

Sure, I mean, first, specific obviously, it's context. WWE Network is one of the most powerful engagement mechanisms we have with our most-passionate fans. It's also our second largest revenue stream incredibly profitable. So we're all thrilled with the performance. I'm telling, I mean, we don't really worry about quarter-to-quarter that much been in the subscription business not long enough. We understand that there are some quarters will be worse than others, and it's really about the long-term on the platform. And we're not going to comment on kind of those specific events obviously.

Evan Wingren -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Makes sense. Thanks.

Operator

We'll take our last question from Alan Gould with Loop Capital.

Alan Gould -- Loop Capital -- Analyst

Thank you for taking the question. Two questions please. In the release you talk about the next iteration of the WWE Network service. Can you give us a little -- can you give us a little more detail on that. Is it going to be a service with more Live Events at a higher price. And secondly with respect to CapEx, you said you've delayed plans, but it's still $70 million to $90 million which is a multiple of what it was this year. Could you explain that a little bit.

George Barrios -- Co-President

I'm not going to get into too much detail on the service. We've got a big revealed plan. But what -- we've talked about that there's repaying that we think we can do. First of all, it's an award-winning service right now, right. The second largest sports as far as service in the world. It won multiple awards on usability and functionality, our fans will love it. So we're thrilled. But we know we can do better. I think, we can do better in three ways. Number one, we integrate what is a treasure trove free video into the service that exists today on multiple platforms that we think we can do something pretty wonderful with that. Number two, we think we can create an opportunity where when you are connecting with us across any one of our digital businesses. We can bring that all together for you as of course today, you've got kind of separate touch points. And then number three, today, well, the services available around the world it's only in English. And we think there's an opportunity to go deeper into the local market. So that won't all happen at once you start seeing it roll out sometime this year, and it will come in phases. But that's really what the next iteration. And then we're really excited to share with folks here in the near future.

On the CapEx, yeah, we talked about the timing because earlier in 2018, we guided toward our historical percent of revenue on CapEx have been 4% to 7%. We said 2018, we expected to be beyond that and it wasn't to your point. So that was the delay into 2019. So, we'll be a little bit more specifics on the exact plan, but as we've said for now 18 months, the company has grown and it's easy opportunities into the future, our workplace strategies to reflect that. So we're kind of putting the final crossing pieces and guiding eyes on that. But that's what's the timing referred to 2018 and to 2019.

Alan Gould -- Loop Capital -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks, George.

Operator

At this time, there is no more phone questions, I'd like to turn the call back over to our presenters for any additional or closing remarks.

Vincent K. McMahon -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, everybody. We appreciate you listening to the call today. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact us.

Operator

This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Duration: 53 minutes

Call participants:

Michael Weitz -- Senior Vice President Financial Planning and Investor Relations

Vincent K. McMahon -- Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

George Barrios -- Co-President

Michelle D. Wilson -- Co-President

Benjamin Swinburne -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

George A. Barrios -- Co-President & Director

Curry Baker -- Guggenheim Securities -- Analyst

David Karnovsky -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Brandon Ross -- BTIG -- Analyst

Eric Handler -- MKM Partners -- Analyst

Vasily Karasyov -- Cannonball Research -- Analyst

Eric Katz -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Laura Martin -- Needham -- Analyst

Evan Wingren -- KeyBanc Capital Markets -- Analyst

Alan Gould -- Loop Capital -- Analyst

More WWE analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.